Thursday, December 4, 2014

Teacher Training for BYOD

Teacher Training for BYOD Programs
Teacher training is an essential element of successful BYOD programs.  School districts interested in developing professional development opportunities for teachers synchronously using multiple mobile devices must consider several factors including: teacher familiarity with current technology, teacher willingness to adapt curricula to emerging technology, and integrating technology into the curricula.  Current research provides insight into the strategies districts are implementing to conquer the challenge of preparing teachers for the 21st century classroom. 
            Lorne Olfman and Pimpaka Prasertsilp suggest that the Constructivist Learning Theory framework is the foundation for creating effective professional development for teachers.  Active engagement in the learning process is necessary for the trainees since they come from a variety of backgrounds, demonstrate diverse levels of comfort with technology, and different motivations for integrating technology in the classroom.  Through active engagement a teacher can be trained individually to use mobile devices to teach a particular lesson about a particular subject or trained as part of a group where the success of the group depends on the level of collaboration of its members (Olfman & Prasertsilp, 2014). 
            Training teachers to integrate the use of personal mobile devices into technology is a multi-step process.  Olfman and Prasersilp (2014) contend that, “the key domains and teaching competencies that are needed to support the in-service teacher training process are technology, curricula, methodology, evaluation, communication, and attitude” (Olfman & Prasertsilp, 2014, p.  56). They continue by focusing their research on the domain of curricula arguing that teacher training in the area of pedagogy should concentrate on “making pedagogical and curricular decisions, mobile technology integration…, systematic planning of technology application, and…implementing processes for applying the technology” (Olfman & Prasertsilp, 2014, p.  56). 
            The chief technology officer (CTO) has an important role for helping develop communication amongst teachers (Raths, 2014).  When teachers work collaboratively in groups, the learning outcomes of their students are more easily achievable.  Developing good attitudes in teachers about the use of technology takes more than an in-service.  Training must extend beyond the in-service and create a lasting network of professionals who seek to meet specific goals: namely active learning for students in both formal and informal settings (Lai, Khaddage, &  Knezek., 2013).  It is the duty of the CTO to provide teachers with long-term opportunities to collaborate and the technology support they need to maintain up-to-date familiarity with existing and emerging technology.
            There are many challenges facing school districts that wish to train teachers for the BYOD paradigm.  The attitude of educators toward allowing students to use mobile devices in the classroom is not determined by any single factor.  However, Blanche O’Bannon and Kevin Thomas point out that teachers over the age of 50 seem most reluctant to implement the use of mobile technology in the classroom.  They suggest that the reluctance is due, in part, to a lack of necessary technology skills and, in part, to a lack of understanding the implications of implementing technology into curricula (O’Bannon & Thomas, 2014).

            Each school district must consider the benefits and challenges of providing BYOD training for its staff.  The cost of training must clearly outweigh the financial burden and time restrictions of the teachers and technology instructors in order to motivate school boards to approve spending.  As universities adjust teacher competencies to include the integration of mobile technology in the classroom, the burden to school districts will likely decrease.  Teachers, already in the classroom, will be forced to adapt or make way for newer, more flexible, candidates.  
Cartoon courtesy of Chief & Chuck. (2011).

No comments:

Post a Comment